Articles
The Hidden Cause Of The Industrial Revolution
What if the Industrial Revolution began not with steam, but with property rights?
August 17, 2026 • 72 Min Watch
Published January 4, 2023
The gender pay gap can remain even among workers with the same role, seniority, and pay structure. One reason is due to unpredictable scheduling. When schedules are unpredictable, women are less likely than men to be able to accept last-minute overtime opportunities and to work odd hours. Making schedules more predictable can help reduce the gap.
Discussion Questions:
Additional Resources:

Valentin Bolotnyy
Many theories exist as to why the gender pay gap exists: Women may take time off to have kids or care for elders; they may shy away from negotiations like asking for raises; or they may experience conscious or unconscious managerial bias.
But what happens when these theories do not apply?
Recent research analyzed seven years of pay data for bus and train operators in Massachusetts where union-negotiated contracts left no room for gender bias or employee negotiation.
Yet even among employees with exactly the same role, seniority level, and earnings per hour worked…women earned 11 percent less in take home pay than their male counterparts.
How? It turns out, when workers’ schedules were more unpredictable or uncontrollable, a larger gender pay gap occurred.
Responsibilities outside of work that require predictable schedules more often fall to women than men, meaning they were less able to accept last-minute overtime opportunities and to work odd hours.
This suggests that one way to reduce the gender pay gap is for firms to improve their scheduling practices, to make them more predictable and controllable for their workers.
Shift-trading, enabling team members to easily substitute for each other, and moving away from a culture of constant availability can be a win-win-win: boosting productivity, helping workers balance demands at work and at home, and narrowing the gender earnings gap.
Articles
What if the Industrial Revolution began not with steam, but with property rights?
August 17, 2026 • 72 Min Watch
Articles
Lydia DePillis of the New York Times has published a pessimistic piece in the New York Times about the economic cost of our hot 2026 summer and future expected hot summers. In this podcast, I optimistically respond to her piece. Here is a very interesting example she reports on.
August 11, 2026
Articles
What matters when time is short? Ben Sasse joins EconTalk’s Russ Roberts for a candid conversation about mortality, faith, family, work, and the institutions that shape American life.
August 10, 2026 • 80 Min Watch